Bibliographie

A Síndrome de Prader-Willi (SPW) e a Síndrome de Angelman (SA) são doenças neurogenéticas consideradas como exemplos do fenômeno de impressão genômica, em seres humanos, estando relacionadas com alterações envolvendo a região cromossômica 15q11-13. As alterações genéticas predominantes, na SPW, são deleções na região 15q11-13, de origem paterna e dissomia uniparental materna e, na SA, encontram-se deleções na região 15q11-13 materna e dissomia uniparental paterna. Estudamos 5 pacientes com suspeita clínica de SPW e 4 pacientes com suspeita clínica de SA, atendidos no Setor de Genética Médica do Hospital das Clínicas da FMRP-USP, com o objetivo de estabelecer o diagnóstico clínico e etiológico nessa amostra. Para isso, utilizamos citogenética convencional normal. Foram confirmados molecularmente 1 caso de SPW por deleção nova, 1 caso de SPW por dissomia uniparental materna e 1 caso de SPW em que a causa genética não pôde ser esclarecida pela análise de polimorfismo com os primers usados. Foram confirmados, molecularmente, 2 casos de SA, ambos por deleção nova na região 15q11-13 e, 1 caso de SA, cuja clí é extremamente sugestiva, teve resultado molecular normal, podendo-se sugerir uma mutação de ponto no gene responsável pela SA.

A balanced Robertsonian translocation 45,XY,t(15q15q) was detected in a patient with mental retardation, microcephaly, and hypertonia. Deletion of the 15q11q13 region was unlikely based on fluorescence in situ hybridization studies that revealed hybridization of appropriate DNA probes to both arms of the Robertsonian chromosome. Inheritance of alleles from 13 highly polymorphic DNA markers on chromosome 15 showed paternal uniparental isodisomy. The clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular results are consistent with a diagnosis of Angelman syndrome.

We studied the clinical and EEG-findings in 28 adult patients (aged 20-53 years) with Angelman syndrome (AS). Twenty-three showed a maternal chromosome 15q11-13 deletion; in 5, the diagnosis was based on a combination of typical clinical findings. Compared to the clinical manifestations present in childhood, "coarsening" of facial traits (100%), thoracic scoliosis (71%), and being wheelchair-bound (39%) were found more frequently. Paroxysms of laughter were still observed in adulthood (79%), but less frequently than in childhood. Most adult patients could feed themselves, but needed help with many daily activities. The majority (82%) had epileptic seizures. Abnormal EEG-activity consisting of 2-3/s rhythmic triphasic waves of high amplitude with a maximum over the frontal regions, which has been identified in many AS children, was found in 67% of these adult patients.

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a relatively frequent disorder of psychomotor development caused by loss of function of a gene from chromosome 15q11-q13, a region subject to genomic imprinting. The AS gene(s) is exclusively expressed from the maternal chromosome. Several kinds of mutations have been found to cause AS. More than half of the cases exhibit a deletion of the maternal 15q11-q13 region. Recently, we and others described a new mutation type, the imprinting mutation, characterised by normal, biparental inheritance but aberrant methylation patterns of the entire chromosomal region. In AS, a paternal imprint is found on the maternal chromosome probably leading to functional inactivation of the AS gene(s). We have now compared the phenotype of 9 AS patients with imprinting mutation to that of nine age-matched ones with a maternally derived deletion. Both groups were evaluated for 19 common AS symptoms. All patients, independently of their molecular findings, showed classical AS symptoms such s mental retardation, delayed motor development, and absent speech. In contrast, for two signs, hypopigmentation and microcephaly, a different distribution among both groups was observed. Only one of nine AS patients with an imprinting mutation, but seven of nine in the deletion control group showed either symptom. Our results suggest that imprinting mutations, in contrast to deletions, cause only incomplete loss of gene function or that maternally derived deletions affect also genes not subject to genomic imprinting. We conclude that AS is caused by loss of function of a major gene that is imprinted but that there are also other genes that contribute to the phenotype when in hemizygous condition.

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is caused by absence of a paternal contribution of the chromosome region 15q11-q13, resulting from paternal deletions, maternal uniparental disomy, or rare imprinting mutations. Laboratory diagnosis is currently performed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), DNA polymorphism (microsatellite) analysis, or DNA methylation analysis at locus PW71 (D15S63). We examined another parent-of-origin-specific DNA methylation assay at exon alpha of the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-associated polypeptide N gene (SNRPN) in patients referred with clinical suspicion of PWS or Angelman syndrome (AS). These included 30 PWS and 17 AS patients with known deletion or uniparental disomy status, and a larger cohort of patients (n = 512) suspected of PWS who had been analyzed previously for their methylation status at the PW71 locus. Results of SNRPN methylation were consistent with known deletion or uniparental disomy (UPD) status as determined by other molecular methods in all 47 cases of PWS and AS. In the larger cohort of possible PWS patients, SNRPN results were consistent with clinical diagnosis by examination and with PW71 methylation results in all cases. These data provide support for the use of SNRPN methylation as a diagnostic method. Because methylation analysis can detect all three major classes of genetic defects associated with PWS (deletion, UPD, or imprinting mutations), methylation analysis with either PW71 or SNRPN is an efficient primary screening test to rule out a diagnosis of PWS. Only patients with an abnormal methylation result require further diagnostic investigation by FISH or DNA polymorphism analysis to distinguish among the three classes for accurate genetic counseling and recurrence-risk assessment.

Published and our own data, included in the CHRODYS database, on the dependence of phenotypic abnormalities in mono-, di-, and trisomics at human chromosome 15 on its parental origin are reviewed. The concept is confirmed that Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes result from the combined effect of gene or chromosome mutations impairing the expression of syndrome-specific genes and from genomic imprinting, i.e., repression of corresponding genes received from one of the parents.

Genomic imprinting is a biological phenomenon determined by an evolutionally acquired, underlying system that may control harmonious development and growth in mammals. It is also relevant to some genetic disorders in man. In this article, lines of biological evidence of imprinting, characteristics of the mouse and human imprinted genes, and findings and mechanisms on the occurrence of several human imprinting disorders are reviewed.

Microdeletions or microduplications have been shown to be associated with a number of important clinical conditions. In most cases no single gene within the segment has been identified as giving rise to the phenotype. The chromosomal rearrangements are generally too small to be identified reliably by standard cytogenetics, but a combination of FISH and molecular methods may be used. This review discusses the application of current knowledge to the prenatal diagnosis of the most common of these conditions i.e. Prader-Willi syndrome, Angelman syndrome, hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type 1 and 22q11 deletion syndromes.

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) are distinct developmental disorders caused by absence of paternal or maternal contributions of the chromosome region 15q11-q13, resulting from deletions, uniparental disomy (UPD), or rare imprinting mutations. Molecular cytogenetic diagnosis is currently performed using a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), DNA polymorphism analysis, and DNA methylation analysis. Only methylation analysis will detect all three categories of PWS abnormalities, but its reliability in tissues other than peripheral blood has not been examined extensively. Therefore, we examined the methylation status at the CpG island of the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein associated polypeptide N (SNRPN) gene and at the PW71 locus using normal and abnormal lymphoblast (LB) cell lines (n = 48), amniotic fluid (AF) cell cultures (n = 25), cultured chorionic villus samples (CVS, n = 17), and fetal tissues (n = 18) by Southern blot analysis with methylation sensitive enzymes. Of these samples, 20 LB cell lines, three AF cultures, one CVS, and 15 fetal tissues had been previously diagnosed as having deletions or UPD by other molecular methods. Methylation status at SNRPN showed consistent results when compared with FISH or DNA polymorphism analysis using all cell types tested. However, the methylation pattern for PW71 was inconsistent when compared with other tests and should therefore not be used on tissues other than peripheral blood. We conclude that SNRPN, but not PW71, methylation analysis may be useful for diagnosis of PWS/AS on LB cell lines, cultured amniotic fluid, or chorionic villus samples and will allow, for the first time, prenatal diagnosis for families known to carry imprinting centre defects.

A de novo interstitial deletion of 15q11-q13 is the major cause of Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS). Here we describe two unrelated PWS patients with a typical deletion, whose fathers have a balanced translocation involving the PWS/AS region. Microsatellite data suggest that the deletion is the result of an unequal crossover between the derivative chromosome 15 and the normal chromosome 15. We conclude that familial translocations involving 15q11-q13 can give rise to interstitial deletions causing PWS or AS and that prenatal diagnosis in such families should include fluorescence in situ hybridisation or microsatellite studies or both.

Genes for Prader Willi syndrome/Angelman syndrome are homologous to genes for fragile X syndrome. Genetic imprinting and expanded trinucleotide repeats cause mental retardation, autism and aggression.

Imprinting on human chromosome 15 is regulated by an imprinting centre, which has been mapped to a 100-kb region including exon 1 of SNRPN. From this region we have identified novel transcripts, which represent alternative transcripts of the SNRPN gene. The novel exons lack protein coding potential and are expressed from the paternal chromosome only. We have also identified intragenic deletions and a point mutation in patients who have Angelman or Prader-Willi syndrome due to a parental imprint switch failure. This suggests that imprint switching on human chromosome 15 may involve alternative SNRPN transcripts.

Certain mammalian genes are expressed exclusively from either the paternal or the maternal chromosome because of a differential marking process that occurs during gametogenesis. This epigenetic marking is called genomic imprinting. Monoallelic expression of imprinted genes is responsible for the inability of uniparental mammalian embryos to develop normally and for the abnormal phenotypes observed with particular chromosomal disomies. Many of the imprinted genes identified to date are involved in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation and, together with other pieces of evidence, they are suggested to play a role in tumorigenesis. Here we discuss how imprinted genes cause diseases and tumors and summarize the recent advances of studies on the molecular basis of this epigenetic phenomenon. In particular, we focus on two well-characterized imprinted chromosomal regions, namely the human Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome region and the mouse INS2/IGF2/H19 region. The correlations between the differential gene activity and the changes in DNA methylation, higher order chromatin structure and replication timing, will shed light on gene regulation at the level of the chromosomal domain.

This review has briefly considered some of the vast amount of information that has been gathered on genomic imprinting and its role in PWS, AS, BWS and Russell-Silver syndrome. The pace of investigation into the phenomenon of imprinting will undoubtedly continue, because our understanding remains far from complete. Newer approaches to identifying imprinted genes based on their expression rather than their location are likely to uncover currently unknown genes. We can also look forward to more insight into the fascinating complexities of the imprinting process.

Allele-specific replication differences have been observed in imprinted chromosomal regions. We have exploited this characteristic of an imprinted region by using FISH at D15S9 and SNRPN (small nuclear ribonucleo protein N) on interphase nuclei to distinguish between Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome patient samples with uniparental disomy of chromosome 15q11-q13 (n = 11) from those with biparental inheritance (n = 13). The familial recurrence risks are low when the child has de novo uniparental disomy and may be as high as 50% when the child has biparental inheritance. The frequency of interphase cells with asynchronous replication was significantly lower in patients with uniparental disomy than in patients with biparental inheritance. Within the sample population of patients with biparental inheritance, those with altered methylation and presumably imprinting center mutations could not be distinguished from those with no currently detectable mutation. This test is cost effective because it is performed on interphase cells from the same hybridized cytological preparation in which a deletion is excluded, and additional specimens are not required to determine the parental origin of chromosome 15.

Patients with disorders involving imprinted genes such as Angelman syndrome (AS) and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) can have a mutation in the imprinting mechanism. Previously, we identified an imprinting center (IC) within chromosome 15q11-ql3 and proposed that IC mutations block resetting of the imprint, fixing on that chromosome the parental imprint (epigenotype) on which the mutation arose. We now describe four new microdeletions of the IC, the smallest (6 kb) of which currently defines the minimal region sufficient to confer an AS imprinting mutation. The AS deletions all overlap this minimal region, centromeric to the PWS microdeletions, which include the first exon of the SNRPN gene. None of five genes or transcripts in the 1.0 Mb vicinity of the IC (ZNF127, SNRPN, PAR-5, IPW, and PAR-1), each normally expressed only from the paternal allele, was expressed in cells from PWS imprinting mutation patients. In contrast, AS imprinting mutation patients show biparental expression of SNRPN and IPW but must lack expression of the putative AS gene 250-1000 kb distal of the IC. These data strongly support a model in which the paternal chromosome of these PWS patients carries an ancestral maternal epigenotype, and the maternal chromosome of these AS patients carries an ancestral paternal epigenotype. The IC therefore functions to reset the maternal and paternal imprints throughout a 2-Mb imprinted domain within human chromosome 15q11-q13 during gametogenesis.

Angelman syndrome (AS) results from lack of genetic contribution from maternal chromosome 15q11-13. This region encompasses three GABAA receptor subunit genes (beta3, alpha5, and gamma3). The characteristic phenotype of AS is severe mental retardation, ataxic gait, tremulousness, and jerky movements. We studied the movement disorder in 11 AS patients, aged 3 to 28 years. Two patients had paternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 15, 8 had a >3 Mb deletion, and 1 had a microdeletion involving loci D15S10, D15S113, and GABRB3. All patients exhibited quasicontinuous rhythmic myoclonus mainly involving hands and face, accompanied by rhythmic 5- to 10-Hz electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. Electromyographic bursts lasted 35 +/- 13 msec and had a frequency of 11 +/- 2.4 Hz. Burst-locked EEG averaging in 5 patients, generated a premyoclonus transient preceding the burst by 19 +/- 5 msec. A cortical spread pattern of myoclonic cortical activity was observed. Seven patients also demonstrated myoclonic seizures. No giant somatosensory evoked potentials or C-reflex were observed. The silent period following motor evoked potentials was shortened by 70%, indicating motor cortex hyperexcitability. Treatment with piracetam in 5 patients significantly improved myoclonus. We conclude that spontaneous, rhythmic, fast-bursting cortical myoclonus is a prominent feature of AS.

Prader-Willi syndrome is characterized by hypotonia and feeding difficulties in the neonatal period, with the childhood development of hyperphagia leading to obesity, developmental delay, hypogonadism, short stature and small hands and feet. Correct diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome is important because of its clinical implications and the need for family genetic counseling. In order to determine the most efficient method of diagnosing the condition, we evaluated 37 patients with a putative diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome by both clinical and molecular cytogenetic analyses. Clinical evaluation showed that 25 patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for Prader-Willi syndrome. A deletion of the region 15q11.2-13 was cytogenetically identified in 20 patients using a high-resolution technique. Four additional cases were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with the cosmid probes for D15S11, r-aminobutyric acid receptor beta 3 (GABRB3), small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-associated peptide N (SNRPN) or D15S10 (Prader-Willi/ Angelman syndrome region probes). The deletion of SNRPN was documented in 24 Prader-Willi syndrome patients. Only one additional patient with typical Prader-Willi syndrome features did not have any deletion over 15q11-13 at either the cytogenetic or molecular level. FISH provides a more reliable method than high-resolution chromosome analysis for the diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome. Associated conditions such as hypopigmentation, small-joint laxity, arachnodactyly, seizure disorder, optic atrophy, congenital heart disease, Perthes' disease, hirsutism, astigmatism/amblyopia, microcephaly and neuropsychiatric disturbances dictate the effects of a contiguous gene syndrome. Morbidity is high among patients with obesity and associated conditions. Appropriate genetic counseling should be given to the parents and dietary management should be helpful for patients with Prader-Willi syndrome.

About 70% of patients with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) have a common interstitial de novo microdeletion encompassing paternal (PWS) or maternal (AS) loci D15S9 to D15S12. Most of the non-deletion PWS patients and a small number of non-deletion AS patients have a maternal or paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 15, respectively. Other chromosome 15 rearrangements and a few smaller atypical deletions, some of the latter being associated with an abnormal methylation pattern, are rarely found. Molecular and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis have both been used to diagnose PWS and AS. Here, we have evaluated, in a typical routine cytogenetic laboratory setting, the efficiency of a diagnostic strategy that starts with a FISH deletion assay using Alu-PCR (polymerase chain reaction)-amplified D15S10-positive yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) 273A2. We performed FISH in 77 patients suspected of having PWS (n = 66) or AS (n = 11) and compared the results with those from classical cytogenetics and wherever possible with those from DNA analysis. A FISH deletion was found in 16/66 patients from the PWS group and in 3/11 patients from the AS group. One example of a centromere 15 co-hybridization performed in order to exclude cryptic translocations or inversions is given. Of the PWS patients, 14 fulfilled Holm's criteria, but two did not. DNA analysis confirmed the common deletion in all patients screened by the D15S63 methylation test and in restriction fragment length polymorphism dosage blots. In 3/58 non-deletion patients, other chromosomal aberrations were found. Of the non-deleted group, 27 subjects (24 PWS, 3 AS) were tested molecularly, and three patients with an uniparental methylation pattern were found in the PWS group. The other 24/27 subjects had neither a FISH deletion nor uniparental methylation, but two had other cytogenetic aberrations. Given that cytogenetic analysis is indispensable in most patients, we find that the FISH deletion assay with YAC 273A2 is an efficient first step for stepwise diagnostic testing and mutation-type analysis of patients suspected of having PWS or AS.

Human chromosome 15q11-q13 encompasses the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and the Angelman syndrome (AS) loci, which are subject to parental imprinting, a process that marks the parental origin of certain chromosomal subregions. A temporal and spatial association between maternal and paternal chromosomes 15 was observed in human T lymphocytes by three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization. This association occurred specifically at the imprinted 15q11-q13 regions only during the late S phase of the cell cycle. Cells from PWS and AS patients were deficient in association, which suggests that normal imprinting involves mutual recognition and preferential association of maternal and paternal chromosomes 15.

A boy was referred at 8 weeks of age for failure to thrive. Cytogenetic and molecular studies showed that he had a large proximal deletion of the maternally derived chromosome 15q. He did not have Angelman syndrome, but at 2 years of age was severely globally delayed. He died at 2 1/2 years of age.

A receptor mapping technique using iodine-123 iomazenil and single-photon emission tomography (SPET) was employed to examine benzodiazepine receptor binding in a patient with Angelman syndrome (AS). AS is characterized by developmental delay, seizures, inappropriate laughter and ataxic movement. In this entity there is a cytogenic deletion of the proximal long arm of chromosome 15q11-q13, where the gene encoding the GABAA receptor beta3 subunit (GABRB3) is located. Since the benzodiazepine receptor is constructed as a receptor-ionophore complex that contains the GABAA receptor, it is a suitable marker for GABA-ergic synapsis. To determine whether benzodiazepine receptor density, which indirectly indicates changes in GABAA receptor density, is altered in the brain in patients with AS, we investigated a 27-year-old woman with AS using 123I-iomazenil and SPET. Receptor density was quantitatively assessed by measuring the binding potential using a simplified method. Regional cerebral blood flow was also measured with N-isopropyl-p-[123I]iodoamphetamine. We demonstrated that benzodiazepine receptor density is severely decreased in the cerebellum, and mildly decreased in the frontal and temporal cortices and basal ganglia, a result which is considered to indicate decreased GABAA receptor density in these regions. Although the deletion of GABRB3 was not observed in the present study, we indirectly demonstrated the disturbance of inhibitory neurotransmission mediated by the GABAA receptor in the investigated patient. 123I-iomazenil with SPET was useful to map benzodiazepine receptors, which indicate GABAA receptor distribution and their density.

OBJECTIVE: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare congenital eurodevelopmental disorder with complex genetic aetiology. Diagnosis may be difficult and there is severe life-long disability. An AS clinic was commenced in Sydney, Australia, in 1993 with the aim of gathering information about the natural history of AS, management issues and parental concerns.
METHODOLOGY: Patients were referred from metropolitan Sydney, rural New South Wales and interstate. A questionnaire, history, physical examination and diagnostic tests were undertaken.
RESULTS: In the first year, 24 patients with AS were assessed. There were 11 males and 13 females, whose ages ranged from 3 to 30 years. The mean age of diagnosis was 12.8 years. The diagnosis was made by neurologists in four cases, by clinical geneticists in three cases, by paediatricians in two cases and 15 cases were diagnosed at the AS clinic. A clear history of epilepsy was obtained in 19 (79%) and in 15 of these patients the age of onset was during the first 4 years of life. An EEG had been performed in 21 patients, and in two the EEG was reported as normal. Fifteen of the patients (62.5%) could walk independently and in this cohort there was a significant sex difference in walking: 10/11 males compared to 5/13 females (P > 0.01). Five patients (21%) were in full-time permanent care. Genetic testing with appropriate DNA probes from chromosome 15 (q11-13), complete in 20 families, showed deletion in 12 patients (60%),uniparental disomy in 1(5%) and no detectable abnormality in 7 (35%).
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of AS should be considered in any patient with severe developmental disability particularly if there is a movement disorder and lack of speech. The control of epilepsy is a major management problem. Further research is needed to establish the frequency and type of seizures, the response to anticonvulsants and to determine if improvement can be expected with age. The mobility of patients should be assessed regularly, to determine the most appropriate options for intervention.

We report on a mentally retarded boy with epileptic seizures, microcephaly, ataxia, and developmental delay. His clinical features were consistent with Angelman syndrome. Fluorescent in situ hybridization and DNA analysis showed a deletion of chromosome 15 q11-13 and thus confirmed the diagnosis. In addition, the patient had a unilateral, incomplete cleft lip, a feature which has not previously been reported in Angelman syndrome.

Angelman syndrome (AS) is associated with a loss of maternal genetic information, which typically occurs as a result of a deletion at 15q11-q13 or paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 15. We report a patient with AS as a result of an unbalanced cryptic translocation whose breakpoint, at 15q11.2, falls within this region. The proband was diagnosed clinically as having Angelman syndrome, but without a detectable cytogenetic deletion, by using high-resolution G-banding. FISH detected a deletion of D15S11 (IR4-3R), with an intact GABRB3 locus. Subsequent studies of the proband's mother and sister detected a cryptic reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 14 and 15 with the breakpoint being between SNRPN and D15S10 (3- 21). The proband was found to have inherited an unbalanced form, being monosomic from 15pter through SNRPN and trisomic for 14pter to 14q11.2. DNA methylation studies showed that the proband had a paternal-only DNA methylation pattern at SNRPN, D15S63 (PW71), and ZNF127. The mother and unaffected sister, both having the balanced translocation, demonstrated normal DNA methylation patterns at all three loci. These data suggest that the gene for AS most likely lies proximal to D15S10, in contrast to the previously published position, although a less likely possibility is that the maternally inherited imprinting center acts in trans in the unaffected balanced translocation carrier sister.

The predominant genetic defects in Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) are 15q11-q13 deletions of paternal origin and maternal chromosome 15 uniparental disomy (UPD). In contrast, maternal deletions and paternal chromosome 15 UPD are associated with a different neurogenetic disorder, Angelman syndrome (AS). In both disorders, these mutations are associated with parent-of-origin specific methylation at several 15q11-q13 loci. The critical PWS region has been narrowed to a approximately 320-kb region between D15S63 and D15S174, encoding several imprinted transcripts, including PAR5, IPW, PAR1 (refs 7,8) and SNRPN, which has so far been considered a strong candidate for the PWS gene. A few PWS-associated microdeletions involving a putative imprinting centre (IC) proximal to SNRPN have also been observed. We have mapped the breakpoint of a balanced translocation (9;15)pat associated with most of the PWS features between SNRPN and IPWIPAR1. Methylation and expression studies indicate that the paternal SNRPN allele is unaffected by the translocation, while IPW and PAR1 are unexpressed. This focuses the attention on genes distal to the breakpoint as the main candidate for PWS genes, and is consistent with a cis action of the putative IC, and suggests that further studies of translocational disruption of the imprinted region may establish genotype-phenotype relationships in this presumptive contiguous gene syndrome.

We have evaluated fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for the clinical laboratory detection of the 15q11-q13 deletion seen in Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) using probes for loci D15S11, SNRPN, D15S10, and GABRB3. In a series of 118 samples from patients referred for PWS or AS, 29 had deletions by FISH analysis. These included two brothers with a paternally transmitted deletion detectable with the probe for SNRPN only. G-banding analysis was less sensitive for deletion detection but useful in demonstrating other cytogenetic alterations in four cases. Methylation and CA-repeat analyses of 15q11-q13 were used to validate the FISH results. Clinical findings of patients with deletions were variable, ranging from newborns with hypotonia as the only presenting feature to children who were classically affected. We conclude that FISH analysis is a rapid and reliable method for detection of deletions within 15q11-q13 and whenever a deletion is found, FISH analysis of parental chromosomes should also be considered.

Angelman syndrome (AS) is characterized by severe mental retardation, absent speech, puppet-like movements, inappropriate laughter, epilepsy, and abnormal electroencephalogram. The majority of AS patients (approximately 65%) have a maternal deficiency within chromosomal region 15q11-q13, caused by maternal deletion or paternal uniparental disomy (UPD). Approximately 35% of AS patients exhibit neither detectable deletion nor UPD, but a subset of these patients have abnormal methylation at several loci in the 15q11-q13 region. We describe here three patients with Angelman syndrome belonging to an extended inbred family. High resolution chromosome analysis combined with DNA analysis using 14 marker loci from the 15ql1-q13 region failed to detect a deletion in any of the three patients. Paternal UPD of chromosome 15 was detected in one case, while the other two patients have abnormal methylation at D15S9, D15S63, and SNRPN. Although the three patients are distantly related, the chromosome 15q11-q13 haplotypes are different, suggesting that independent mutations gave rise to AS in this family.

Individuals with a ring 15 chromosome [r(15)] and those with Russell-Silver syndrome have short stature, developmental delay, triangular face, and clinodactyly. To assess whether the apparent phenotypic overlap of these conditions reflects a common genetic cause, the extent of deletions in chromosome 15q was determined in 5 patients with r(15), 1 patient with del 15q26.1-qter, and 5 patients with Russell-Silver syndrome. All patients with Russell-Silver syndrome were diploid for genetic markers in distal 15q, indicating that Russell-Silver syndrome in these individuals was unlikely to be related to the expression of single alleles at these or linked genetic loci. At least 3 distinct sites of chromosome breakage close to the telomere were found in the r(15) and del 15q25.1-qter patients, with 1 r(15) patient having both a terminal and an interstitial deletion. Although the patient with del 15q25.1-qter exhibited the largest deletion and the most profound growth retardation, the degree of growth impairment among the r(15) patients was not correlated with the size of the deleted interval. Rather, the parental origin of the ring chromosome in several patients was associated with phenotypes that are also seen in patients with either Prader-Willi (PWS) or Angelman (AS) syndromes, conditions that result from uniparental expression of genes on chromosome 15. In fact, unequal representation of chromosome 15 alleles in 1 patient with r(15) suggests the possibility that a mosaic karyotype composed of the constitutional cell line and cell line(s) possibly deficient in the ring chromosome might be present. The PWS-like or AS-like phenotypes could be explained by postzygotic loss of the ring chromosome, leading to uniparental inheritance of the intact chromosome in some tissues of r(15) patients.

Angelman syndrome (AS) is caused by the loss of function of undefined gene(s) on human chromosome 15. The majority of subjects have deletions involving maternally-derived chromosome 15q11-q13, and the shortest region of deletion overlap (SRO) has been localized to the region between D15S10 and D15S113. In this study, yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs), 6G-D4, 9H-D2 and 37D-F9, mapping within the AS SRO, were isolated from the ICI YAC library. Alu-vector PCR products were amplified from the YACs and from YACs A229A2 and A33F10 which had been obtained from the St. Louis YAC library. The PCR products were cloned and sequenced, and three new sequence-tagged sites were generated within the AS SRO, facilitating the characterization of gene(s) involved in the Angelman syndrome.

The most important genetic advances in the field of mental retardation include the discovery of the novel genetic mechanism responsible for the Fragile X syndrome, and the imprinting involved in the Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes, but there have also been advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of Down syndrome and phenylketonuria. Genetic defects (both single gene Mendelizing disorders and cytogenetic abnormalities) are involved in a substantial proportion of cases of mild as well as severe mental retardation, indicating that the previous equating of severe mental retardation with pathology, and of mild retardation with normal variation, is a misleading over-simplication. Within the group in which no pathological cause can be detected, behaviour genetic studies indicate that genetic influences are important, but that their interplay with environmental factors, which are also important, is at present poorly understood. Research into the joint action of genetic and environmental influences in this group will be an important research area in the future.

We report the clinical features in 27 Australasian patients with Angelman syndrome (AS), all with a DNA deletion involving chromosome 15(q11-13), spanning markers from D15S9 to D15S12, about 3 center dot 5 Mb of DNA. There were nine males and 18 females. All cases were sporadic. The mean age at last review (end of 1994) was 11 center dot 2 years (range 3 to 34 years). All patients were ataxic, severely retarded, and lacking recognisable speech. In all patients, head circumference (HC) at birth was normal but skewed in distribution, with 62 center dot 5% at the 10th centile. At last review HC was around the 50th centile in three patients (12 center dot 5%) while 15 had poor postnatal head growth. Short stature was not invariable, 5/26 (19%) were on or above the 50th centile. Hypotonia at birth was recorded in 15/24 (63%) and neonatal feeding difficulties were recorded in 20/26 (77%). Epilepsy was present in 26/27 (96%) with onset by the third year of life in 20 patients (83%). Improvement in epilepsy was reported in 11/16 patients (69%) with age. An abnormal EEG was reported in 25/25 patients. Hypopigmentation was present in 19/26 (73%). One patient had oculocutaneous albinism. Five patients could not walk independently. Of the remaining 22 who could walk, age of onset of walking ranged from 2 to 8 years. Disrupted sleep patterns were present in 18/21 patients (86%), with improvement in 9/12 patients (75%) over 10 years of age. The clinical features in this group of deletional AS patients were similar to previous reports, but these have not separated patients into subgroups based on DNA studies. In our group of deletional cases, 100% showed severe mental retardation, ataxic movements, absent language, abnormal EEG, happy disposition (noted in infancy in 95%), normal birth weight and head circumference at birth, and a large, wide mouth. These features occurred with a higher frequency than in AS patients as a whole. Our study also provided information on the evolution of the phenotype. The data can act as a benchmark for comparisons of AS resulting from other genetic mechanisms.

The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of angelman syndrome in prepubertal school-aged children and analyze its comorbidity with autistic disorder. A clinical/psychiatric evaluation of a population-based sample of 6- to 13-year-old mentally retarded children with active epilepsy was performed. Four individuals in a total population of almost 49,000 children conformed to the clinical diagnosis of Angelman syndrome. Two of these had a typical microdeletion at chromosome 15q11-13. The minimum prevalence of Angelman syndrome was estimated at 0.008% (1: 12,000) in the examined age group. All 4 children with Angelman syndrome met full behavioral criteria for the diagnosis of autistic disorder/childhood autism. It is concluded that Angelman syndrome is uncommon, but more frequent than previously estimated. The diagnosis should be considered in all patients with combined autistic disorder, severe mental retardation, and epilepsy. The implications of the possible association of Angelman syndrome and autism are discussed.

The human SNRPN (small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide N) gene is one of a gene family that encode proteins involved in pre-mRNA splicing and maps to the smallest deletion region involved in the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) within chromosome 15q11-q13. Paternal only expression of SNRPN has previously been demonstrated by use of cell lines from PWS patients (maternal allele only) and Angelman syndrome (AS) patients (paternal allele only). We have characterized two previously unidentified 5' exons of the SNRPN gene and demonstrate that exons -1 and 0 are included in the full-length transcript. This gene is expressed in a wide range of somatic tissues and at high, approximately equal levels in all regions of the brain. Both the first exon of SNRPN (exon -1) and the putative transcription start site are embedded within a CpG island. This CpG island is extensively methylated on the repressed maternal allele and is unmethylated on the expressed paternal allele, in a wide range of fetal and adult somatic cells. This provides a quick and highly reliable diagnostic assay for PWS and AS, which is based on DNA-methylation analysis that has been tested on > 100 patients in a variety of tissues. Conversely, several CpG sites approximately 22 kb downstream of the transcription start site in intron 5 are preferentially methylated on the expressed paternal allele in somatic tissues and male germ cells, whereas these same sites are unmethylated in fetal oocytes. These findings are consistent with a key role for DNA methylation in the imprinted inheritance and subsequent gene expression of the human SNRPN gene.

In order to further our understanding of the epigenetic modifications of DNA and its role in imprinting, we examined DNA methylation patterns of human tissues of uniparental origin. We used complete hydatidiform moles (CHM), which are totally androgenetic conceptions, to examine the paternal methylation pattern in the absence of a maternal contribution and we used ovarian teratomas to represent the maternal counterpart. We carried out an analysis of DNA methylation of a gene which has been shown to contain sites which are differentially methylated in a parent-specific fashion. The gene, ZNF127, is located on chromosome 15q11-q13 in the region associated with Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. The parent-of-origin DNA methylation has been postulated to reflect the presence of an imprint and recent studies have confirmed that ZNF127 is differentially expressed only from the paternal chromosome. We identified a unique pattern of hyper- and hypomethylated sites in androgenetic conceptions which was nearly identical to the paternal pattern found in sperm. This may represent the paternal germ-line methylation imprint. We also studied partial hydatidiform moles, non-molar triploid conceptions, normal chorionic villi, and somatic tissue. These all demonstrated a modified DNA methylation pattern characteristic of normal chorionic villi with only limited findings of the imprint. Our results suggest that human androgenetic conceptions may provide an excellent model to analyze epigenetic DNA modifications, such as methylation, in imprinted genes. The paternal allele-specific methylation imprint will also be useful clinically to confirm the androgenetic nature of suspected molar conceptions in which parental blood samples may not be available.

Microdissection combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (micro-FISH) was used to visualize deletions in rearranged human chromosomes and in a de novo translocation. In each experiment five copies of a structurally aberrant chromosome or of the two chromosomes involved in the de novo translocation were isolated by microdissection and amplified using DOP-PCR. The PCR products were then used as probes for FISH to metaphase chromosomes of three patients. After reverse chromosome painting, the structurally aberrant chromosomes were completely painted, and the region deleted in the aberrant chromosomes was visible in the normal chromosomes. The smallest deletion that could be demonstrated this way was a microdeletion of approximately 6 x 10(6) bp, which is frequently reported in Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes.

Parental imprinting is a process that results in allele-specific differences in transcription, DNA methylation, and DNA replication timing. Imprinting plays an important role in development, and its deregulation can cause certain defined disease states. Absence of a paternal contribution to chromosome 15q11-q13, due to hemizygous deletion or uniparental disomy, results in the Prader-Willi syndrome. The absence of a normal maternal copy of the same region causes Angelman syndrome. The Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is associated with the failure of normal biparental inheritance of chromosome 11p15, and loss of imprinting is observed in several cancers including Wilms' tumor. The study of the molecular basis of abnormal imprinting in these disorders will facilitate the identification and characterization of other imprinted human disease loci.

A male child has been identified with Angelman syndrome. He has been shown to carry a de novo Robertsonian 15/15 translocation where both chromosome 15s have been derived from the father. Consequently the disease in this instance is due to paternal uniparental disomy.

Due to DNA technology, it is now apparent that the mechanisms of genetic disease are more complex than the model of a gene with biallelic expression in the diploid state. If a gene is imprinted, monoallelic expression is the norm when the chromosomes of a pair are inherited normally from each parent. Uniparental disomy (UPD) is the abnormal situation where both chromosomes of a pair come from the same parent. When the chromosome contains an imprinted gene, UPD may result in nullisomy or disomy for a functional copy of that gene. If there are two imprinted loci on the same chromosome, UPD for that chromosome results in nullisomy for one imprinted gene but functional disomy for the other a "diploid overdose" (DO). This situation has been well demonstrated in the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) which is the nullisomic phenotype for the PWS gene(s) on chromosome 15q11-13. Chromosome 15q11-13 also contains the gene for Angelman syndrome (AS) which has a phenotype distinct from PWS. Both loci are subject to imprinting--in PWS, the imprint is on the maternal chromosome 15, in AS it is on the paternal chromosome 15. All individuals with PWS due to maternal UPD, while functionally nullisomic for the PWS locus, are functionally disomic for the AS locus--a DO situation. Assuming that biallelic expression of an imprinted gene is harmful, one would expect DO for an imprinted gene to produce a phenotypic effect. Cases of PWS due to UPD do not appear to differ from those due to deletion (hypopigmentation in deletional cases can be explained by loss of D15S12 downstream from the critical region). There is no good evidence of DO for the AS locus in PWS due to UPD. Why then was it 'necessary' in evolutionary terms to imprint the AS locus and maintain the imprint faithfully for life. A similar situation of two imprinted genes on the same chromosome occurs with IGF2 and H19 on chromosome 11p15. Maternal imprinting for IGF2 and paternal imprinting for H19 is the norm. Paternal UPD in this situation does lead to a DO effect, namely Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. The possibility of a DO effect needs to be considered when assessing the phenotypic spectrum of UPD for other chromosomes currently under investigation.

Genomic imprinting, or differential expression of alleles based on parental origin, is documented for numerous mouse and human loci and is implicated in various phenotypes such as Wilms tumor, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, and Angelman syndrome. Improved methods would facilitate the analysis of imprinting, and we describe a simple strategy designed to analyze transcripts for imprinting in mouse and human using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in combination with GC-clamped denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). As a demonstration, novel polymorphisms in the untranslated portions of mRNA between CBA/NJ and Skive strains of mice were identified and used to document paternal expression of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein associated polypeptide N (Snrpn) in brain, maternal expression of H19 in liver, and biallelic expression of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenease (Gapd) in liver. The method was also used to demonstrate a new polymorphism and monoallelic expression of H19 in human peripheral leukocytes. Assessment of imprinting for novel or unstudied transcripts requires identification and analysis of polymorphisms at the RNA level, and we believe that RT-PCR with DGGE is a preferred method for this application, with advantages over nuclease protection and other methods.

The gene encoding the tight junction (zonula occludens) protein, TJP1, was mapped to humanchromosome 15q13 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a cDNA probe. The Jackson Laboratory backcross DNA panel derived from the cross (C57BL/6JEi x SPRET/Ei) F1 females x SPRET/Ei males was used to map the mouse Tjp1 to chromosome 7 near position 30 on the Chromosome Committee Map, a region with conserved homology to human chromosome 15q13. FISH studies on metaphases from patients with the Prader-Willi (PWS) or the Angelman syndrome (AS) showed that TJP1 maps close but distal to the PWS/AS chromosome region.

Using a bromodeoxyuridine incorporation method to detect replicated DNA, we studied allele-specific replication of several sites within the human Prader-Willi/Angelman and IGF2/H19 imprinted regions. No obvious allele-specific differences in time of replication were detected at most loci previously reported to replicate asynchronously in the same cell types as determined by a FISH-based replication assay. Our finding of an absence of allelic replication asynchrony may be related to low levels of imprinted gene expression near these loci in the examined cells (lymphocytes, fibroblasts and lymphoblastoid cells). This view is supported by our studies of the imprinted SNRPN gene in that cells with paternal allele-specific expression (lymphocytes and lymphoblasts) replicate SNRPN alleles asynchronously, whereas cells with a low level of expression (HeLa) replicate SNRPN later and with less allelic asynchrony. In lymphoblasts, the early replicating allele of SNRPN was identified as the paternal one based on the properties of maternal allele-specific methylation and paternal allele-specific expression. Our studies suggest that FISH data implying replication asynchrony in nonexpressing cells reflect structural differences between the maternal and paternal alleles rather than differences in replication timing.

We report an electroclinical and cytogenetic study of 4 patients with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS). In all cases, we observed a stereotyped EEG and clinical picture characterized by generalized or unilateral myoclonic seizures followed later by brief atypical absences. Electrographically, these were accompanied by a sequence of centroparietal or parietotemporal sharp waves; high-voltage wave with a superimposed spike becoming unusual spike-wave complexes, often elicited by eye closure; burst of diffuse spikes and waves; and frequent jerks. This electroclinical pattern is very similar to the one described in Angelman syndrome (AS) in which a defect in GABAA receptor function has been suggested. Moreover, the genes encoding the GABAA receptor subunit have been mapped to the p12-p13 bands of chromosome 4. Even though the deletion in these cases does not encompass the 4p12-p13 region, we suggest that the electroclinical picture common to WHS and AS might represent a characteristic type of epilepsy linked to a common genetic abnormality.

We studied the seizure and polygraphic patterns of 18 patients with Angelman's syndrome. All patients showed movement problems. Eleven patients were also reported to have long-lasting periods of jerky movements. The polygraphic recording showed a myoclonic status epilepticus in nine of them. Seven patients had partial seizures with eye deviation and vomiting, similar to those of childhood occipital epilepsies. These seizures and electroencephalographic patterns suggest that Angelman's syndrome occurs in most of the patients as a nonprogressive, age-dependent myoclonic encephalopathy with a prominent occipital involvement. These findings indicate that, whereas ataxia is a constant symptom in Angelman's syndrome, the occurrence of a transient myoclonic status epilepticus may account for the recurrence of different abnormal movements, namely the jerky ones.

DNA replication kinetics of Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome region of 15q11.2q12 was studied without synchronization in five human amniotic cell and five skin fibroblast strains with a marker 15 chromosome, i.e., 15p+ or der(15), as cytological marker to distinguish between the two homologs. BrdU-33258 Hoechst-Giemsa techniques were used to analyze and compare the late replication patterns in the 15q11.2q12 region between the homologs. Asynchronous replication between the homologs was observed in both amniocytes and fibroblasts. From cells of a marker 15 of known parental origin, the paternal 15q11.2q12 replicated earlier than that of the maternal 15 in 92%-95% of asynchronous metaphases. The remaining 5%-8% of asynchronous metaphases displayed maternal early/paternal late replication. This mosaic pattern of replication in the 15q11.2q12 region may be due to methylation mosaicism of genomic imprinting or a relative lack of self-control of replication. These results provide cytogenetic evidence of maternal imprinting and delayed replication in the 15q11.2q12 region.

We report a patient with mental retardation, behavioral disturbances, and pigmentary anomalies, consistent with the phenotype of hypomelanosis of Ito (HMI), and in whom cytogenetic analysis revealed mosaicism for an unbalanced translocation. His karyotype is 45, XY,-7,-15,+der(7)(7:15)t(q34:q13)/46,XY. He is therefore monosomic for 7q34 to qter and 15pter to q13 in the cells containing the translocation. The human homolog (P) of the p gene (the product of the mouse pink-eyed dilution locus) maps to 15q11q13. Loss of this locus is believed to be associated with abnormalities of pigmentation, such as the hypopigmentation seen in patients with deletions of 15q11q13, and the Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. Mutations within the P gene have also been associated with tyrosinase-positive (type II) oculocutaneous albinism. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, we confirmed that our patient is deleted for one copy of a P gene probe in the cells with the unbalanced translocation, and for loci within the region critical for the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes. Although hypomelanosis of Ito is a heterogeneous disorder, we postulate that, in our case and potentially in others, this phenotype may result directly from the loss of specific pigmentation genes.

A 4-month-old child with multiple anomalies was determined to have an interstitial deletion of chromosome 15, i.e., del(15) (q12q14). The deletion appears not to be a typical deletion of 15q12 such as seen in Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes, but appears to be more distal, involving either loss of all of 15q12 and part of 15q14, or part of 15q12 and most of 15q14. In either case, 15q13 is missing. Fluorescent in situ hybridization with probes for 15 centromere (D15Z), pericentromeric satellite sequences (D15Z1), and chromosome 15 painting probes shows the deleted chromosome to involve only 15 and no other acrocentric chromosome. Hybridization with probes for the AS and PWS loci (D15S11 and GABAB3, Oncor) show both sites to be intact in the deleted 15. The case is compared with two other reports with overlapping interstitial deletions of proximal 15q, neither of which shows typical features of Angelman or Prader-Willi syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Meiotic recombination events do not occur randomly along a chromosome, but appear to be restricted to specific regions. In addition, some regions in the genome undergo recombination more frequently in the germ cells of one sex than the other. Genomic imprinting, the process by which the two parental alleles of a gene are differentially marked, is another genetic phenomenon associated with inheritance from only one parent or the other. The mechanisms that control meiotic recombination and genomic imprinting are unknown, but both phenomena necessarily depend on the presence of some DNA signal sequences and/or on the structure of the surrounding chromatin domain.
RESULTS: In the present study, we compared the frequencies of sex-specific recombination events in three chromosomal regions of the human genome that contain clustered imprinted genes. Alignment of the genetic and physical maps of the ZNF127-SNRPN-IPW-PAR-5-PAR-1 region on chromosome 15q11-q13 (associated with Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes) and the IGF2-H19 region on chromosome 11p15.5 (associated with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome) shows that both regions recombine with very high frequency during male meiosis, and with very low frequency during female meiosis. A third region around the WT-1 gene on chromosome 11p13 also recombines with higher frequency during male meiosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the two best-known imprinted regions in the human genome are characterized by significant differences in recombination frequency during male and female meioses. A third, less well-characterized, imprinted region shows a similar sex-specific bias. On the basis of these observations, we propose a model suggesting that the region-specific differential accessibility of DNA that leads to differential recombination rates during male and female meioses also leads to the male- and female-specific modification of the signal sequences that control genomic imprinting.

Two patients with classical features of Angel-man syndrome (AS) and one with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) had unbalanced reciprocal translocations involving the chromosome 15 proximal long arm and the telomeric region of chromosomes 7, 8 and 10. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used for the detection of chromosome 15(q11-13) deletions (with probes from the PWS/AS region) and to define the involvement of the telomere in the derivative chromosomes (with library probes and telomere-specific probes). The 15(q11-13) region was not deleted in one patient but was deleted in the other two. The telomere on the derivative chromosomes 7, 8 and 10 was deleted in all three cases. Thus, these are true reciprocal translocations in which there has been loss of the small satellited reciprocal chromosome (15) fragment.

The Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) with Angelman's syndrome form a pair known above all due to problems of genetic imprinting and uniparental disomy. Both phenomena drew attention to the importance of control of expression of different alleles and their genetic origin. The causes of the two syndromes have not been elucidated unequivocally so far. In case of the PWS, at least, there is the possibility of a gene of the protein carrier of a small nuclear ribonucleic acid described as SNRPN. In case of Marfan's syndrome the responsible gene is the fibrillin gene (FNB1) with the locus on area 15q21. The mentioned gene participates probably also in diseases caused by a change of the vascular wall (aneurysm) and in prolapse of the mitral valves. On the 15th chromosome are several representatives of the family of genes of cytochrome P450 the products of which play a part in the metabolism of exogenous substances, incl. pharmaceutical ones. Their activity is part of the natural sensitivity or resistance to some chemical cancerogens. The postscriptis devoted to the assumed locus of dyslexia DLX1.

Chromosomal changes through pericentric inversions play an important role in the origin of species. Certain pericentric inversions are too minute to be detected cytogenetically, thus hindering the complete reconstruction of hominoid phylogeny. The advent of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique has facilitated the identification of many chromosomal segments, even at the single gene level. Therefore the cosmid probe for Prader-Willi (PWS)/Angelman syndrome to the loci on human chromosome 15 [q11-13] is being used as a marker to highlight the complementary sequence in higher primates. We hybridized metaphase chromosomes of chimpanzee (PTR), gorilla (GGO), and orangutan (PPY) with this probe (Oncor) to characterize the chromosomal segments because the nature of these pericentric inversions remains relatively unknown. Our observations suggest that a pericentric inversion has occurred in chimpanzee chromosome (PTR 16) which corresponds to human chromosome 15 at PTR 16 band p11-12, while in gorilla (GGO 15) and orangutan (PPY 16) the bands q11-13 complemented to human chromosome 15 band q11-13. This approach has proven to be a better avenue to characterize the pericentric inversions which have apparently occurred during human evolution. "Genetic" divergence in the speciation process which occurs through "chromosomal" rearrangement needs to be reevaluated and further explored using newer techniques.

Parental, or genomic, imprinting is a newly described form of genetic regulation, leading to the differential behavior of each parental copy of a gene. The precise mechanism responsible for the imprint, or allele-specific behavior of gene transcription, is still unclear; it is thought that modifications not involving the DNA base sequence (therefore, epigenetic as opposed to genetic) have occurred during the production of egg and sperm that mark genes according to parental origin. Several imprinted genes have been identified that also show allelic differences in cytosine methylation and in the timing of their replication during cell division; the relevance of this finding to imprinting mechanisms awaits further clarification. Despite our incomplete knowledge, the importance of the field of imprinting to the pediatrician is in its contribution to our understanding of the transmission behavior of many human diseases and syndromes, particularly those involving abnormal growth and development. Recent advances in the field will no doubt lead to more widely available diagnostic tools with potential applications as far-reaching as the investigation of unexplained fetal loss, prenatal diagnosis, and disease risk counseling.

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) are distinct mental retardation syndromes caused by paternal and maternal deficiencies, respectively, in chromosome 15q11-q13. Approximately 70% of these patients have a large deletion of approximately 4 Mb extending from D15S9 (ML34) through D15S12 (IR10). To further characterize the deletion breakpoints proximal to D15S9, three new polymorphic microsatellite markers were developed that showed observed heterozygosities of 60%-87%. D15S541 and D15S542 were isolated from YAC A124A3 containing the D15S18 (IR39) locus. D15S543 was isolated from a cosmid cloned from the proximal right end of YAC 254B5 containing the D15S9 (ML34) locus. Gene-centromere mapping of these markers, using a panel of ovarian teratomas of known meiotic origin, extended the genetic map of chromosome 15 by 2-3 cM toward the centromere. Analysis of the more proximal S541/S542 markers on 53 Prader-Willi and 33 Angelman deletion patients indicated two classes of patients: 44% (35/80) of the informative patients were deleted for these markers (class I), while 56% (45/80) were not deleted (class II), with no difference between PWS and AS. In contrast, D15S543 was deleted in all informative patients (13/48) or showed the presence of a single allele (in 35/48 patients), suggesting that this marker is deleted in the majority of PWS and AS cases. These results confirm the presence of two common proximal deletion breakpoint regions in both Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes and are consistent with the same deletion mechanism being responsible for paternal and maternal deletions. One breakpoint region lies between D15S541/S542 and D15S543, with an additional breakpoint region being proximal to D15S541/S542.

We have studied a patient with Angelman syndrome (AS) and a 47,XY,+inv dup(15) (pter-->q11::q11-->pter) karyotype. Molecular cytogenetic studies demonstrated that one of the apparently normal 15s was deleted at loci D15S9, GABRB3, and D15S12. There were no additional copies of these loci on the inv dup(15). The inv dup(15) contained only the pericentromeric sequence D15Z1. Quantitative DNA analysis confirmed these findings and documented a standard large deletion of sequences from 15q11-q13, as usually seen in patients with AS. DNA methylation testing at D15S63 showed a deletion of the maternally derived chromosome 15q11-q13 on one of the apparently cytogenetically normal 15s, and not by the presence of an inv dup(15). This is the fourth patient with an inv dup(15) and AS or Prader Willi syndrome, who has been studied at the molecular level. In all cases an additional alteration of chromosome 15 was identified, which was hypothesized to be the cause of the disease. Patients with inv dup(15)s may be at increased risk for other chromosome abnormalities involving 15q11-q13.

We present a patient with a chromosomal mosaicism involving the X chromosome. One cell line is 45,X and the other has a de novo paternally derived dicentric X;15 translocation. Her karyotype is therefore 45,X/45,X,dic(X;15)(Xpter-->Xq26.1::15p11-->15 qter) based on G-banding. The presence of 2 centromeres on the derivative X was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and a deletion of Xq26.1-->qter was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using DXS52 and DXYS154. Replication banding studies indicate that the derivative X is late replicating. Based on these studies, it is unclear whether inactivation has spread to proximal 15q. The patient has a unique phenotype distinct from Ullrich-Turner or Prader-Willi syndromes, but includes ataxia and language delay which are commonly seen in Angelman syndrome. These findings are contrary to those anticipated since deficiency of paternal genes at 15q12 typically leads to Prader-Willi syndrome. Molecular analysis of PCR-based polymorphisms of chromosome 15 and X indicates that uniparental disomy is not present for the X chromosome or chromosome 15 in either cell line. It is hypothesized that her phenotype results from the interaction of the 2 abnormal genotypes. Each abnormality may be diluted by the mosaicism and, in the derivative X line, by the possible variation among cells of inactivation spreading to chromosome 15.

Previously, 158 nuclear families with probands suspected of having either Prader Willi (PWS) or Angelman syndrome (AS) were analyzed with polymorphic DNA markers from the 15q11-13 region. These cases have been re-evaluated with the probe PW71 (D15S63), which detects parent-of-origin-specific alleles after digestion with a methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme (HpaII). Application of PW71 to DNA samples isolated from leucocytes, confirmed the deletions and uniparental disomies detected earlier by marker analysis, and resolved 50% of the previously uninformative (n = 18) cases. PW71 and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis indicated that, in all resolved cases, disomies of the 15q11-13 region were present. The use of PW71 increased the percentage of disomies detected in our PWS and AS patient groups. Almost 50% of our PWS patients and 17% of the AS patients showed a disomy of maternal or paternal origin, respectively. DNA of first trimester chorionic villi and of fibroblast cultures was not suitable for analysis with PW71 because of different methylation patterns. The application of PW71 is recommended for the diagnosis of the PWS and AS, with respect to DNA samples from blood.

Meiotic recombination is a specifically timed and regulated process which does not occur randomly throughout the genome, but tends to be clustered in 'hotspots'. There is extensive evidence that recombination rate is influenced by chromatin conformation and that events are primarily initiated at gene promoter regions. In an effort to determine the pattern of chromatin condensation and recombination at meiosis in an imprinted region, fine scale genetic mapping in the approximately 4 Mb Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome deletion region was undertaken. The results indicate that the male-female recombination ratio can vary significantly over short regions. A male recombination hotspot is localized to between the 3' end of GABRA5 and D15S156, which is adjacent to but outside the putative AS/PWS imprinted regions. In addition, a region of relatively high recombination in females is observed between D15S128 and D15S97, which spans a domain of paternal allele-specific transcription implicated in the Prader-Willi syndrome. It is inferred that the inactivation and relative condensation of this latter region on the maternal chromosome occurs as a post-meiotic modification.

Eighty seven referrals with Prader-Willi syndrome and 49 with Angelman's syndrome were studied. High resolution cytogenetics was performed on all probands. Molecular studies, performed on the proband and both parents in each case, utilised multiple probes from within and distal to the 15(q11-13) region in order to establish the presence of DNA deletion or uniparental disomy. In addition, FISH, with probes at D15S11 and GABR beta 3 from the Prader-Willi syndrome/Angelman's syndrome region, was performed on a subset of 25 of these patients. In the referral group with Prader-Willi syndrome, 62 patients had a normal karyotype and 25 were deleted on high resolution cytogenetics. Twenty nine were found to be deleted with DNA techniques. In the Angelman's syndrome group, 37 had a normal karyotype and 12 were deleted on high resolution cytogenetics while 26 were deleted on molecular studies. The diagnosis was reassessed in 35 referrals with Prader-Willi syndrome and 11 with Angelman's syndrome following a non-deleted, non-disomic result. Of individuals who were neither deleted nor disomic on DNA studies, a false positive rate of 11.4% (4/35) for Prader-Willi syndrome and 16.7% (2/12) for Angelman's syndrome was found for a cytogenetically detected deletion. The false negative rate for deletion detected on high resolution cytogenetics was 19.5% (12/62) for Prader-Willi syndrome and 35% (13/37) for Angelman's syndrome. Thus high resolution cytogenetics was shown to be unreliable for deletion detection and should not be used alone to diagnose either syndrome.

We demonstrated previously that an alpha 1-beta 2-gamma 2 gene cluster of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptor is located on human chromosome 5q34-q35 and that an ancestral alpha-beta-gamma gene cluster probably spawned clusters on chromosomes 4, 5, and 15. Here, we report that the alpha 4 gene (GABRA4) maps to human chromosome 4p14-q12, defining a cluster comprising the alpha 2, alpha 4, beta 1, and gamma 1 genes. The existence of an alpha 2-alpha 4-beta 1-gamma 1 cluster on chromosome 4 and an alpha 1-alpha 6-beta 2-gamma 2 cluster on chromosome 5 provides further evidence that the number of ancestral GABAA receptor subunit genes has been expanded by duplication within an ancestral gene cluster. Moreover, if duplication of the alpha gene occurred before duplication of the ancestral gene cluster, then a heretofore undiscovered subtype of alpha subunit should be located on human chromosome 15q11-q13 within an alpha 5-alpha x-beta 3-gamma 3 gene cluster at the locus for Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes.

Contiguous gene syndromes are characterized by deletions or duplications of specific chromosomal segments involving clusters of single genes. Although these syndromes are associated with distinct clinical phenotypes, these features are difficult to distinguish in the newborn and early childhood periods. In such cases, demonstration of chromosomal involvement through cytogenetic studies is of vital importance in arriving at an accurate diagnosis. In this article results of microdeletion analysis of 31 cases comprising 16 cases of Prader-Willi syndrome, 3 of Angelman syndrome, 7 of Miller-Dieker syndrome, and 5 of DiGeorge syndrome are reported. All patients were studied with both high-resolution chromosome analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization. In the majority of cases there is 100% concordance between the two techniques. However, in one patient suspected of having DiGeorge syndrome with a normal karyotype at the 750 band level, fluorescence in situ hybridization identified a deletion within the critical region. Without fluorescence in situ hybridization studies on this patient, it would not have been possible to confirm the diagnosis of DiGeorge syndrome cytogenetically. Based on these results and other studies reported in the literature, it is recommended that all suspected cases of microdeletion syndromes should be studied using fluorescence in situ hybridization, irrespective of high-resolution chromosome results. However, because of the difficulties associated with clinical diagnosis of these syndromes, fluorescence in situ hybridization should not replace standard chromosome analysis.

A subset of patients with Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome have apparently normal chromosomes of biparental origin, but abnormal DNA methylation at several loci within chromosome 15q11-13, and probably have a defect in imprinting. Using probes from a newly established 160-kb contig including D15S63 (PW71) and SNRPN, we have identified inherited microdeletions in two AS families and three PWS families. The deletions probably affect a single genetic element that we term the 15q11-13 imprinting centre (IC). In our model, the IC regulates the chromatin structure, DNA methylation and gene expression in cis throughout 15q11-13. Mutations of the imprinting centre can be transmitted silently through the germline of one sex, but appear to block the resetting of the imprint in the germline of the opposite sex. Published erratum appears in Nat Genet 1995 Jun;10(2):249

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a genetic disorder that is associated with a deletion on chromosome 15, and is characterized by abnormalities or impairments in neurological, motor and intellectual functioning. While behaviour problems have been reported in clients with AS, relatively little is known about their developmental course and outcome. In this study, data on the nature and prevalence of behaviour problems among clients with AS were gathered from two sources: (1) a review of published case reports; and (2) parent responses to a survey of behaviour problems in a small (n = 11) sample of children with AS. Data from both sources showed that behaviour problems were present in males and females of all ages, and included language deficits, excessive laughter, hyperactivity, short attention span, problems with eating and sleeping, aggression, noncompliance, mouthing of objects, tantrums, and repetitive and stereotyped behaviour. Identification and treatment of severe behaviour problems in clients with AS may improve their adaptive functioning.

We report on a combined high resolution cytogenetic and fluorescent in situ hybridization study (FISH) on 15 Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and 14 Angelman syndrome (AS) patients. High resolution banding showed a microdeletion in the 15q11-q13 region in 7 out of 15 PWS patients, and FISH analysis of the D15S11 and SNRPN cosmids demonstrated absence of the critical region in three additional cases. Likewise 8 out of 14 AS patients were found to be deleted with FISH, using the GABRB3 specific cosmid, whereas only 4 of them had a cytogenetically detectable deletion.

We describe 47 patients with Angelman syndrome (AS) from Belgium and the Netherlands, including the anamnestic data, the clinical and the behavioral attributes at different ages. The clinical picture of AS is most distinct between the ages of 2-16 years. Most patients of this age group show at least 8 of the major characteristics (bursts of laughter, happy disposition, hyperactive behaviour, microcephaly, brachycephaly, macrostomia, tongue protrusion, mandibular prognathism, widely spaced teeth, stiff and puppetlike movements, typical stature, wide based gait) beside the mental retardation and (almost) absence of speech, which is a universal trait. The diagnosis in infants is based on only a limited number of clinical characteristics or on anamnestic data. However, if these occur in combination, they are indicative of AS. In older patients, the diagnosis may be hampered in part because of the changing behavioral characteristics and the decreasing frequency of fits. Other manifestations, such as scoliosis, may become more pronounced with age.

In a series of 18 individuals comprising parents of Angelman syndrome (AS) patients and AS patients with large deletions, microdeletions, and no deletions, we utilized fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with genomic phage clones for loci D15S63 and GABRB3 for deletion detection of chromosome 15q11-q13. Utilization of probes at these loci allows detection of common large deletions and permits discrimination of less common small deletions. In all individuals the molecular cytogenetic data were concordant with the DNA deletion analyses. FISH provides an accurate method of deletion detection for chromosome 15q11-q13.

With improvements in culturing and banding techniques, amniotic fluid studies now achieve a level of resolution at which the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) region may be questioned. Chromosome 15 heteromorphisms, detected with Q- and R-banding and used in conjunction with PWS/AS region-specific probes, can confirm a chromosome deletion and establish origin to predict the clinical outcome. We report four de novo cases of an abnormal-appearing chromosome 15 in amniotic fluid samples referred for advanced maternal age or a history of a previous chromosomally abnormal child. The chromosomes were characterized using G-, Q-, and R-banding, as well as isotopic and fluorescent in situ hybridization of DNA probes specific for the proximal chromosome 15 long arm. In two cases, one chromosome 15 homolog showed a consistent deletion of the ONCOR PWS/AS region A and B. In the other two cases, one of which involved an inversion with one breakpoint in the PWS/AS region, all of the proximal chromosome 15 long arm DNA probes used in the in situ hybridization were present on both homologs. Clinical follow-up was not available on these samples, as in all cases the parents chose to terminate the pregnancies. These cases demonstrate the ability to prenatally diagnose chromosome 15 abnormalities associated with PWS/AS. In addition, they highlight the need for a better understanding of this region for accurate prenatal diagnosis.

Seventeen patients presenting with either de novo or familial supernumerary marker (mar) 15 chromosomes were shown by fluorescent in situ hybridization techniques (FISH) to have markers derived from and composed entirely of chromosome 15 material. Using a combination of conventional cytogenetics, FISH, Southern blotting and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, it was possible to sub-classify the 17 mar(15)s into six distinct morphological and molecular groups. Analysis of DNA and metaphase spreads from the probands and their parents using probes and primers from the pericentromeric and Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes critical regions (PWS/AS), clearly differentiated between marker 15s which included the PWS/AS critical regions and those which did not. A direct correlation between the presence of the PWS/AS region in the mar(15) and severe mental retardation was observed. Based on these results, a system of classification of supernumerary marker 15 chromosomes is proposed.

Deletions of 15q11-q13 typically result in Angelman syndrome when inherited from the mother and Prader-Willi syndrome when inherited from the father. The critical deletion region for Angelman syndrome has recently been restricted by a report of an Angelman syndrome patient with a deletion spanning less than 200 kb around the D15S113 locus. We report here on a mother and son with a deletion of chromosome 15 that includes the D15S113 locus. The son has mild to moderate mental retardation and minor anomalies, while the mother has a borderline intellectual deficit and slightly downslanting palpebral fissures. Neither patient has the seizures, excessive laughter and hand clapping, ataxia or the facial anomalies which are characteristic of Angelman syndrome. The proximal boundary of the deletion in our patients lies between the D15S10 and the D15S113 loci. Our patients do not have Angelman syndrome, despite the deletion of the D15S113 marker. This suggests that the Angelman syndrome critical deletion region is now defined as the overlap between the deletion found in the previously reported Angelman syndrome patient and the region that is intact in our patients.

Parental genomic imprinting is the phenomenon in which the behavior of a gene is modified, depending on the sex of the transmitting parent [Peterson and Sapienza (1993): Annu Rev Genet 27:7-31]. Recent observations have revealed that the inheritance patterns, age-of-onset, severity, and etiology of certain human diseases can be explained by aberrations in the establishment or the maintenance of the imprint. Examples include the Prader-Willi, Angelman, and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndromes [Nicholls (1994): Am J Hum Genet 54:733-740], malignancy [Sapienza (1990): Biochim Biophys Acta 1072:51-61; Feinberg (1993): Nat Genet 4:110-113], and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) [Julier et al. (1994) Nature 354:155-159; Bennett et al. (1995) Nat Genet 9:284-292]. We review the evidence that implicates an imprinted gene in the INS-IGF2 region of chromosome 11p15 in the etiology of IDDM (referred to as the IDDM2 locus) and show that in human fetal pancreas, INS is not imprinted, thus providing an argument against INS as the candidate gene. We also examine imprinting effects on the expression of IGF2 in components of the human immune system believed to be important in IDDM and show imprinted expression in fetal thymus as early as 15 weeks gestation. We demonstrate further that in the circulating mononuclear cells of two individuals, lectin-stimulated IGF2 transcription was biallelic, indicating relaxation of imprinting, whereas in one individual, transcription was monoallelic. Finally, we review the current available data supporting a role for insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) in the immune system and, more specifically, discuss the evidence supporting a role for the IGFs in the prevention of apoptosis. These data have led us to formulate a novel hypothesis that could mechanistically explain the involvement of the IDDM2 locus in the pathogenesis of IDDM.

1) Uniparental disomy (UPD) results from the exceptional derivation of a pair of the offspring chromosome from one parent only and has been documented thus far for chromosomes 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22 both X's and the XY pair. Its consequences on the phenotype may result from three potentially harmful effects, namely isodisomy, interference with genomic imprinting and, occasionally the vestigial aneuploidy from which UPD may have originated.
2) In isodisomy, the uniparental pair is partially or entirely homozygous, through the duplication of a same chromosomal DNA template, thus bringing about an increased risk of recessive disorders. As a result, conditions such as cystic fibrosis, a type of osteogenesis imperfecta, thalassemia alpha or beta, retinoblastoma, rod monochromacy, etc., have now been reported.
3) Duplication of both homologues of a parental pair in a diploid genome is called heterodisomy. Both iso- and heterodisomy may also cause disruption of the genomic imprints normally modifying the differential expression of some maternal and paternal genes or gene sequences needed for eugenic growth and development, in the course of normal biparental inheritance. Such a disturbance can be one of the causes of congenital clinical entities as well defined as Angelman, Prader-Willi or Beckwith-Wiedemann syndromes and some new syndromes, for instance for UPD 7 mat, UPD 14 mat and, probably also 14 pat.
4) All in all, UPD can cause morbidity or lethality by altering imprinting processes, mimicking certain deletions or duplications, generating recessive disorders or prompting malignant tumor development. 5) In the clinical field, UPD occasionally upsets some mendelian tenets of traditional inheritance, and raises, the question of the evolutional role plaid by genomic imprinting (GI). An hypothetical opinion is that one of GI potential side effects is a biased intergenerational preferential display or skip of parental features. This could be so because some of the inherited genes or gene domains only gain maternal or paternal expression in the offspring, as a function of their parental imprint.

Two de novo abnormal derivatives of chromosome 15, inv dup(15) and dup(15q) were found in a girl with developmental delay and mild dysmorphological signs. Fluorescence in situ hybridization, using DNA probes of the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes (PWS/AS) critical region and chromosome-15-specific alpha-satellite, combined with molecular analysis using dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms within the PWS/AS region and the parent-of-origin specific methylation sites at the locus D15S63, shed light on how the abnormal karyotype was formed. We suggest that a translocation between the two homologues of maternal chromosomes 15 resulted in the formation of dup(15q) and two reciprocal products: an acentric fragment of 15q that was lost and a centric fragment that underwent U-type reunion to form inv dup(15).

The authors describe 7 new cases of Angelman syndrome (AS: 3 males and 4 females) diagnosed on the basis of clinical features (dysmorphic facial features, severe mental retardation with absent speech, peculiar jerky movements, ataxic gait and paroxysms of inappropriate laughter) and neurophysiological findings. Failure to detect deletion of the long arm of chromosome 15 or the absence of epileptic seizure were not considered sufficient to exclude a diagnosis of AS. Feeding problems, developmental delay and early signs of ataxia, especially tremor on handling objects and unstable posture when seated, proved effective as clinical markers for early diagnosis of AS. The EEG patterns characteristic of AS were found within the first 2 years of life (under 18 months in the majority of cases). The authors conclude that AS should be included in differential diagnosis in a child aged under 12 months having cryptogenic psychomotor retardation with prevalent language compromise. Repeat EEG recordings are needed to check for the typical trace, and cytogenetic investigations are mandatory.

High resolution chromosome analysis, molecular cytogenetics, and study of the association between specific chromosome rearrangements and single gene disorders have provided a chromosomal basis to a number of mendelian diseases. Deletions and duplications of small regions, usually less than 3 Mb in size, result in an alteration of normal gene dosage of a number of unrelated genes physically close to each other and are responsible for contiguous gene syndromes. For example, haploinsufficiency is implicated for del 8q24.1 in Langer-Giedion syndrome, del 17p13.3 in Miller-Dieker syndrome, and del 22q11.2 in DiGeorge and Velo-cardiofacial syndromes. Another chromosomal mechanism causing mendelian phenotypes is translocation, which may eventually interrupt a disease gene. It is assumed that translocation breakpoints are running through a relevant gene, hindering the production of the gene product. An example is breakage 16p13.3 associated with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Females with X/autosome translocations have an almost exclusive inactivation of the normal X. Interruption of a disease gene in the translocated X causes the expression of a mendelian phenotype in the presence of an allelic recessive mutation onto the nonrearranged X. Finally, if a human gene shows exclusive expression from a single parental homologue, ie, it is imprinted, deletion of the chromosomal segment containing the active allele results in structural monosomy and functional nullisomy. This situation is illustrated by Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. Over seventy human genes have been precisely assigned to chromosomal regions using a cytogenetic approach. Chromosome techniques combined with molecular methods have proved to have powerful and sensitive diagnostic capabilities.

Par en haut !
This way up !
Retour à la page d'accueil...
Back to Home Page...