Bibliographie

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a complex neurological disorder with different genetic aetiologies. It is not known whether the clinical features vary depending on the genetic mechanism. We report four patients with AS owing to uniparental disomy (UPD). There were two males and two females, with a mean age of 8 years (range 7 to 11 years). All patients had a happy disposition, hyperactive behaviour, and the characteristic facial phenotype of AS, but in three there was a normal head circumference, two had epilepsy, ataxic movements were mild in three, the mean age of onset of walking was 2.4 years, and there was some sign language in all four patients. Our cases add further weight to the previously reported impressions of a milder phenotype in cases of AS resulting from UPD than in deleted AS patients. Patients suspected of having AS, but who are considered atypical, warrant DNA testing.

Uniparental disomy (UPD) is often the result of an aneuploid event masquerading under the features of diploidy. As such, it may never be recognized, being at 2 opposite phenotypic poles, harmless to the bearer, or, if harmful, eventually responsible for uncharacteristic although perhaps serious conditions. UPD can also be associated with problems such as recessiveness or mosaicism. This article considers the chances of unmasking UPD, in the course of CVS or AC prenatal diagnosis, by reviewing the main cytogenetic signals and major familial or personal antecedents raising its suspicion. Once suspected, the lead toward UPD may or may not be followed through appropriate molecular studies. UPD for either maternal or paternal chromosomes 13, 21 and 22 may not have consistent, common deleterious effects, while other identified UPD's are too rare to call. Unconditionally, main, consistent or near consistent damages to the phenotype have been traced to specific chromosome pairs such as 15 mat (Prader-Willi syndrome), 15 pat (Angelman syndrome), 11 pat (Wiedemann-Beck with syndrome), 14 mat and pat (multiple cogenital and developmental anomalies [MCDA]-several rather constant) and 7 mat (Russel-Silver [RS] and Growth-failure [GF]). The above problems all stem from an alteration of the normal, developmentally important genomic imprinting processes and most of them may recognize several etiopathogenic paths, other than UPD, none of which abides by straight Mendelian rules. In this very area, therefore, a new, non-traditional type of inheritance is confronting genetic counselling. In this paper, for want of appropriate semantic language, the neologism "likon" (or "laikon") is coined to make reference to the hemizygously expressed sequences of the genomic parts imprinted in the somatic tissues. Broadening the definition, the word is then applied to the 4 possible epigenotypes of imprinted domains, which depend on the parental sex-of-origin: germinally "resting" (R), or "acting" (A), to be made somatically silent, that is to say "unexpressed" (U), or transcribed and "expressed" (E), thus abbreviated as EA, ER, UA and UR. Entire pedigrees may then be analyzed accordingly in health and in disease. Examples are presented herewith.

A balanced Robertsonian translocation 45,XY,t(15q15q) was detected in a patient with mental retardation, microcephaly, and hypertonia. Deletion of the 15q11q13 region was unlikely based on fluorescence in situ hybridization studies that revealed hybridization of appropriate DNA probes to both arms of the Robertsonian chromosome. Inheritance of alleles from 13 highly polymorphic DNA markers on chromosome 15 showed paternal uniparental isodisomy. The clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular results are consistent with a diagnosis of Angelman syndrome.

Allele-specific replication differences have been observed in imprinted chromosomal regions. We have exploited this characteristic of an imprinted region by using FISH at D15S9 and SNRPN (small nuclear ribonucleo protein N) on interphase nuclei to distinguish between Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome patient samples with uniparental disomy of chromosome 15q11-q13 (n = 11) from those with biparental inheritance (n = 13). The familial recurrence risks are low when the child has de novo uniparental disomy and may be as high as 50% when the child has biparental inheritance. The frequency of interphase cells with asynchronous replication was significantly lower in patients with uniparental disomy than in patients with biparental inheritance. Within the sample population of patients with biparental inheritance, those with altered methylation and presumably imprinting center mutations could not be distinguished from those with no currently detectable mutation. This test is cost effective because it is performed on interphase cells from the same hybridized cytological preparation in which a deletion is excluded, and additional specimens are not required to determine the parental origin of chromosome 15.

1) Uniparental disomy (UPD) results from the exceptional derivation of a pair of the offspring chromosome from one parent only and has been documented thus far for chromosomes 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22 both X's and the XY pair. Its consequences on the phenotype may result from three potentially harmful effects, namely isodisomy, interference with genomic imprinting and, occasionally the vestigial aneuploidy from which UPD may have originated.
2) In isodisomy, the uniparental pair is partially or entirely homozygous, through the duplication of a same chromosomal DNA template, thus bringing about an increased risk of recessive disorders. As a result, conditions such as cystic fibrosis, a type of osteogenesis imperfecta, thalassemia alpha or beta, retinoblastoma, rod monochromacy, etc., have now been reported.
3) Duplication of both homologues of a parental pair in a diploid genome is called heterodisomy. Both iso- and heterodisomy may also cause disruption of the genomic imprints normally modifying the differential expression of some maternal and paternal genes or gene sequences needed for eugenic growth and development, in the course of normal biparental inheritance. Such a disturbance can be one of the causes of congenital clinical entities as well defined as Angelman, Prader-Willi or Beckwith-Wiedemann syndromes and some new syndromes, for instance for UPD 7 mat, UPD 14 mat and, probably also 14 pat.
4) All in all, UPD can cause morbidity or lethality by altering imprinting processes, mimicking certain deletions or duplications, generating recessive disorders or prompting malignant tumor development. 5) In the clinical field, UPD occasionally upsets some mendelian tenets of traditional inheritance, and raises, the question of the evolutional role plaid by genomic imprinting (GI). An hypothetical opinion is that one of GI potential side effects is a biased intergenerational preferential display or skip of parental features. This could be so because some of the inherited genes or gene domains only gain maternal or paternal expression in the offspring, as a function of their parental imprint.

The Angelman syndrome (AS) is a neurological disorder characterized by severe mental retardation, absent speech, seizures, gait disturbances, and a typical age-dependent facial phenotype. Most cases are due to an interstitial deletion on the maternally inherited chromosome 15, in the critical region q11-q13. Rare cases also result from paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 15. In a group of 14 patients with sporadic AS diagnosed in Switzerland, we found 2 unrelated females with paternal isodisomy for the entire chromosome 15. Their phenotypes were milder than usually seen in this syndrome: one girl did not show the typical AS facial changes; both patients had late-onset mild seizures; as they grew older, they had largely undisturbed gross motor functions, in particular no severe ataxia. Both girls were born to older fathers (45 and 43 years old, respectively). The apparent association of a relatively milder phenotype in AS with paternal uniparental disomy will have to be confirmed by detailed clinical descriptions of further patients.

A 29-year-old male with Angelman syndrome and an unbalanced reciprocal translocation, 45,XY,-8, -15, +der(8),t(8;15)(p23.3;q11)pat, was evaluated with DNA studies. These showed the underlying mechanism to be paternal uniparental disomy. This is the second case reported of Angelman syndrome that has resulted from a familial unbalanced reciprocal translocation.

A patient with Angelman syndrome and a 46,XY/47,XY,+inv dup(15)(pter-->q11: q11-->pter) karyotype and a patient with Prader-Willi syndrome and a 46,XY/47,XY,+inv dup(15)(pter-->q12: q12-->pter) karyotype were investigated with molecular markers along chromosome 15. Paternal uniparental isodisomy was found for all informative markers in the first case which indicates that this, rather than the presence of the extra chromosome, is the cause of the Angelman syndrome phenotype. Similarly, the PWS patient showed maternal uniparental distomy with absence of PWS region material on the inv dup(15) chromosome. If (1) marker chromosomes are an occasional by product of 'rescuing' a trisomic fertilisation, or (2) if duplication of the normal homologue in a zygote which has inherited a marker in place of the normal corresponding chromosome 'rescues' an aneuploid fertilisation, or (3) if the presence or formation of a marker chromosome increases the probability of non-disjunction, then uniparental disomy might be found occasionally in other subjects with de novo marker chromosomes.

Uniparental disomy is responsible for a proportion of cases in Prader-Willi, Angelman, and Wiedemann-Beckwith syndromes. In these syndromes, the chromosomes involved are thought to contain one or more imprinted genes. When two copies of the imprinted (inactivated) gene are inherited from a single parent through uniparental disomy or the active gene is deleted, the phenotype of the syndrome results. Our goal is to identify additional syndromes caused by uniparental disomy. Our approach is to select syndromes that appear to have more than one mode of inheritance and are occasionally associated with a cytogenetic abnormality. Given this criterion, we have chosen Brachmann-de Lange Syndrome (BDLS) to investigate since the phenotype is similar to that found in patients with dup(3q). We have studied 16 probands with BDLS and their parents using a multiplex of four PCR-based polymorphic loci on chromosome 3. None of the probands studied had uniparental disomy for chromosome 3 and all demonstrated normal biparental inheritance for at least one locus. Given these results, uniparental disomy of chromosome 3 does not appear to be a major contributor to the syndrome. Additionally, both maternally and paternally derived chromosome abnormalities have resulted in the dup(3q) phenotype and dominant inheritance of BDLS from both mildly affected mothers and fathers have been reported which suggests that imprinting is not involved in these syndromes.

Although Angelman (AS) and Prader-Willi (PWS) syndromes are human genetic disorders with distinctly different developmental and neurobehavioural phenotypes, they both have abnormalities in inheritance of chromosome 15q11-q13. Whether AS or PWS arises depends on the parental origin of a deletion or uniparental disomy (the inheritance of 2 copies of a genetic locus from only one parent) for 15q11-q13. Normal development requires a genetic contribution for this genetic region from both a male and a female parent. The dependence on parental origin implies that genes in human 15q11-q13 have distinct functions depending upon epigenetic, parent-of-origin differences, known as genomic imprinting. Here, I review the role of uniparental disomy and genomic imprinting in the pathogenesis of AS and PWS, and briefly discuss phenotype-genotype correlations using candidate genes and mouse models, in particular for hypopigmentation.

Chromosome 15 (15q11-q13) abnormalities cause two distinct conditions, Angelman syndrome (AS) and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). We present the first case of a child with a balanced 15;15 translocation and AS in whom molecular studies were crucial in confirming a diagnosis. DNA polymorphisms demonstrated paternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 15, consistent with the diagnosis of AS. The molecular studies also showed the patient to be homozygous at all loci for which the father was heterozygous, suggesting that the structural rearrangement was an isochromosome 15q and not a Robertsonian translocation.

Parental ages associated with both maternal and paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 15 are highly elevated in comparison to Zurich population-based controls, with mean maternal and paternal ages of 35.6 and 38.1, respectively for UPD patients (diagnosed in Zurich) and 28.0 and 31.0, in controls. The parental ages are also significantly higher than observed for trisomies of other chromosomes diagnosed in Zurich. The higher age of UPD cases may be due to the fact that two errors, both a gain and a loss of a chromosome 15, are necessary. We suggest that gamete complementation, zygote formation from two gametes one of which is nullisomic and the other disomic for the same chromosome, may be a major mechanism of UPD formation, as well as secondary loss of a chromosome in a trisomic conception, and that there is an association between increased paternal age and nondisjunction.

Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes are clinically distinct neurobehavioral disorders most commonly resulting from large deletions of chromosome 15q11-q13. The deletions arise differentially during maternal or paternal gametogenesis, respectively. A subgroup of patients with either syndrome have no apparent deletion, and because many such patients with Prader-Willi syndrome display inheritance of two copies of chromosome 15 from the mother only (uniparental disomy; UPD), we suggested that paternal UPD might be found in patients with Angelman syndrome. We report here clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular evidence on the 1 patient with paternal UPD for chromosome 15 who was found in our study population. This represents, to our knowledge, the first patient with paternal UPD to be studied with DNA probes from the chromosome 15q11-q13 critical region. In contrast to our findings for patients with Prader-Willi syndrome, in which maternal UPD was common, our data demonstrate that paternal UPD is infrequent in patients with Angelman syndrome.

Angelman's syndrome and Prader-Willi syndrome are both causes of mental retardation with recognisable, but quite different, clinical phenotypes. Both are associated with deletions of chromosome 15q11-13, of maternal origin in Angelman's and paternal in Prader-Willi. Prader-Willi can arise by inheritance of two chromosomes 15 from the mother and none from the father (uniparental maternal disomy). In 2 patients with Angelman's syndrome we found evidence of uniparental paternal disomy. The phenotypic effects of maternal and paternal disomy of chromosome 15 are very different and inheritance of two normal 15s from one parent does not lead to normal development--strong evidence in man for genomic imprinting, in which the same gene has different effects dependent upon its parental origin.

Genetic imprinting has been implicated in the etiology of two clinically distinct but cytogenetically indistinguishable disorders--Angelman syndrome (AS) and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). This hypothesis is derived from two lines of evidence. First, while the molecular extents of de novo cytogenetic deletions of chromosome 15q11q13 in AS and PWS patients are the same, the deletions originate from different parental chromosomes. In AS, the deletion occurs in the maternally inherited chromosome 15, while in PWS the deletion is found in the paternally inherited chromosome 15. The second line of evidence comes from the deletion of an abnormal parental contribution of 15q11q13 in PWS patients without a cytogenetic and molecular deletion. These patients have two maternal copies and no paternal copy of 15q11q13 (maternal uniparental disomy) instead of one copy from each parent. By qualitative hybridization with chromosome 15q11q13 specific DNA markers, we have now examined DNA samples from 10 AS patients (at least seven of which are familial cases) with no cytogenetic or molecular deletion of chromosome 15q11q13. Inheritance of one maternal copy and one paternal copy of 15q11q13 was observed in each family, suggesting that paternal uniparental disomy of 15q11q13 is not responsible for expression of the AS phenotype in these patients.