Sep. 21 - S. Havas  
 
 
 

Images taken on September 21th 2002 by Steve Havas, and processed by myself.

 > October 4th images
 > October 11th images

 
 

R filter

median of images 1 to 20, R filter:

>download .fits<   >.gzip version<
sum of images 1 to 20, R filter:


>download .fits<   >.gzip version<

All Luminance
median of images 1 to 8, all luminance:


 >download .fits<   >.gzip version<

sum of images 1 to 8, all luminance:


 >download .fits<   >.gzip version<


Median of 3 "darks":  >download .fits.gz<

Original 'fits' files from S. Havas:  >download .tar.gz<
 
 

DSS with the position given by the Zetas for September 15th 2002 (green circle). The green box show the field of the images taken on September, 21th.
 

ESO-DSS 1:


 >download .fits.gz<





ESO-DSS Red:


 >download .fits.gz<





ESO-DSS InfraRed:


 >download .fits.gz<



 
 
 

=>  Nothing new appears on September 21th images. But is Nibiru detectable in such conditions ?
 
 
 

Problem of the size of Nibiru

 
According to these informations:
 http://www.zetatalk.com/usenet/use90661.htm
on September, 15th, Nibiru's diameter is ~ 0.3 arcsec, and its swirl of dust and moons is ~ 1.2 arcsec ( = 33% the size of Uranus, see below).
Due to the faintness of the object, and the fact that its size is still lower than the 'seeing' (~ 1 arcsec), Nibiru is still very difficult to detect, and may be invisible on S. Havas' images.
 
 



 
 
 
 
 

 Observations                     Home